Grievance Studies Affair

The ConspiricometerYep, That Happened

Academic hoax conducted by three scholars who successfully published fabricated papers with absurd premises in peer-reviewed gender studies journals, exposing potential weaknesses in academic review processes.

The Grievance Studies Affair was an academic hoax conducted between 2017 and 2018 by James Lindsay, Helen Pluckrose, and Peter Boghossian, who submitted twenty fabricated papers with deliberately absurd or problematic premises to peer-reviewed journals in gender studies, queer studies, race studies, and related fields. Their goal was to test what they perceived as declining academic standards in these disciplines.

The trio created fictitious research projects with intentionally outrageous conclusions, including papers arguing that dog parks perpetuate rape culture, that men should be trained like dogs to prevent sexual violence, and that bodybuilding represents a form of fascist ideology. Seven of their papers were accepted for publication, seven were rejected, and six remained under review when they revealed the hoax in October 2018.

Among the accepted papers was one published in Gender, Place & Culture that claimed to have studied rape culture in dog parks through observational research, and another in Sex Roles that argued for chaining men to the ground to teach them about privilege. The hoax authors used fabricated data, false citations, and invented research methodologies to support their conclusions.

The affair sparked intense debate about academic integrity, peer review standards, and the state of social science research. Supporters argued it exposed legitimate problems with ideologically-driven scholarship, while critics contended that the hoax represented unethical research conduct and that similar problems could be found across academic disciplines. The incident influenced ongoing discussions about reproducibility, bias, and quality control in academic publishing.

Bibliography: